Last winter, the White Sox boldly retooled their defending champion roster, trading for Jim Thome and Javier Vazquez after breaking the bank (by the standards of the time) to re-sign Paul Konerko. I was an outspoken critic of these moves, not only because the Sox gave up a lot of talent--including top prospect Chris Young--but also because they weren't the kind of team that would really benefit from the additions.
Even after the Southsiders penciled three big names into their 2006 lineup card, they were projected for just 82 wins by both PECOTA and Diamond Mind simulations. Why was a 99-win roster plus two big-name additions suddenly about to regress to .500? Because the 2005 White Sox were a highly aberrant team, winning on the strength of career years for virtually every member of the pitching staff, plus outperforming their Pythagorean record by 8 games. When every pitcher outperforms expectations, the staff as a whole is expected to regress the following year, which they did.
The White Sox still won 90 games last year, primarily because they stayed remarkably healthy, but also owing to a few overachievers, this time on the other side of the ball: Joe Crede, Jim Thome, Paul Konerko and especially Jermaine Dye all handily beat their preseason expectations. As with the pitchers the year before, it is likely that each will see their value drop significantly in 2007. To wit:
The 2007 Line represents each player's PECOTA forecast. What the chart demonstrates, other than Jim Thome's career-long studliness, is that the middle of the Pale Hose order is due for a correction. What about the pitching? Will they bounce back to 2005's level?
The ERA forecasts may look brutal, but PECOTA usually appears pessimistic for pitchers; Johan Santana is the only starter projected for a 3.25 or lower ERA who will begin 2007 on an active roster. Furthermore, all except Vazquez are finesse pitchers, and pitchers who cannot rack up strikeouts are much more prone to regression. Notice, however, that three of the four are projected to have a substantially lower ERA than in 2004, which isn't that far ago in baseball time. The common theme, though, is that the magic of 2005 isn't coming back.
A third factor towards a probable 2007 regression is the team's health. Last year, the Sox racked up a total of 15 DL days, all from Jose Contreras missing two starts. That's a remarkable record, one that puts the team on the short list of healthiest teams ever. Perhaps some of this is the result of good training techniques, but it has more to do with simple good fortune, which has no predictive value. There's little reason to believe the Sox will be much healthier than an average team in 2007.
There's really nothing here that someone who passed Stats 100 can't follow. Two years running, the Sox have had several aberrant individual performances, plus good health and good karma, which has led to 189 wins, but doesn't bode well for the team's future. My predictions model, based on 2007 PECOTA forecasts adjusted for playing time, portends a 74-win season for a team that has no superstar talent--a .900 OPS at DH or a corner spot in the AL is hardly a superstar--plus a lineup with several offensive zeros and a very tough schedule.
Of course, that's not the view that the public is taking. Rather, they believe that the 2007 Sox will combine 2005's pitching success with 2006's hitting success and jump back to the top of the division, ignoring both common mathematical sense and the current zip codes of the 2005 bullpen that was the championship team's biggest strength.
Yesterday, MLB.com previewed the AL Central. Not surprisingly, Jim Molony picks the White Sox to win the division, although he also expects the Tigers to be better than they were in 2006 and still somehow finish second, the Indians to have an "excellent chance to make the playoffs" if their bullpen succeeds, the fourth-place Twins to still contend for the division crown, and the fifth-place Royals to win 74 games. Apparently he feels the Central teams will win about 70% of their games outside the division.
Molony's delusion may begin with his assertion that Sox GM Ken Williams "worked to improve his staff this winter." Um, what? If I'm banking on winning a World Series right now, trading Freddy Garcia and Brandon McCarthy for Gavin Floyd, Gio Gonzalez, and John Danks is not the first step I'd take.
This is not to say I don't like these trades; I think Williams won both of them. However, I do think that he is operating from a different angle. Williams is presumably a smart enough guy to know that his team is not talented enough to be a leading contender for a title in 2007, though of course he won't come out and say it. Without the need to load up for '07, he can make trades that maximize his long-term return. Giving up one year of Freddy Garcia for many potentially cheap and useful years from young pitchers is the opposite of the moves Williams has made for years, trading promising young players for Garcia, Todd Ritchie, Vazquez, Thome, Carl Everett, and others. These trades resulted in some short-term gains, but deprived the Sox of years of cheap service time from Chris Young, Kip Wells, Josh Fogg, Jon Rauch, Gary Majewski, Luis Vizcaino, and Gio Gonzalez before he was re-acquired.
Though the Sox won a championship, they didn't do it through expensive trade acquisitions, but rather with homegrown talent and deft signings. Garcia and Everett played bit parts in the World Series run, while Crede, Garland, Aaron Rowand, Juan Uribe, Tadahito Iguchi, Bobby Jenks, Dustin Hermanson and others formed the core of a team while earning a relative pittance in salaries.
These trades don't make the Sox better off in 2007, but they should return a profit in every year beyond that, and that's what really counts. If Williams can flip Buehrle and Vazquez for good returns at the deadline, the seeds will be planted for a solid future.